Samples taken from 100 men in Denmark reveal the presence of a ‘cocktail’ of toxic chemicals, causing scientists to question how these chemicals are affecting our ability to reproduce.
While a large portion of Gen-Z isn’t exactly rushing to populate the Earth (duh, it’s burning!), there’s been concern in recent years that declining sperm counts in men could lead to population problems in the future.
Research from the early 90s detected a 50 percent decline in global sperm counts globally when compared to the 1970s. In a study conducted two decades later, that number had shot up closer to 60 percent.
Today, nearly 1 in 8 American couples struggle with infertility, but pinpointing the cause of male infertility is not an easy task for reproductive specialists. Genetic diseases, hormonal imbalances, and other factors – stress, obesity, smoking, drug use, and sedentary lifestyles – can all play a part.
But what about the things we can’t always avoid, like the ‘forever chemicals’ embedded in fast food wrappers or added into cosmetic products? What impact are these having on our ability to have a future mini-me?
A recent study on Danish men aged 18 to 30 years old discovered ‘alarming’ quantities of bisphenol, phthalates, and dioxins in their urine samples. The levels of these chemicals in the body were reported 100x higher than considered safe.
Phthalates (for example, BPA & BPS) are used in everyday plastics and can be used to make coatings for heat, water, and stain resistant products. They will never naturally break down, instead accumulating in humans and our environments over time.
These plastic chemicals are known to mimic hormones such as oestrogen, interfering with human pathways to inhibit the effects of testosterone – ultimately messing with the reproductive capabilities of men and young adults, too.
Experts say that while headlines claiming the human race will die out due to declining sperm count are overdramatic and unfounded, evidence that phthalates, pesticides, heavy metals, toxic gases, and other synthetic materials are hindering human fertility is growing.
Understanding the effects of these chemicals has seen studies focus more on sperm motility (the amount of healthy, swimming sperm) over traditional research’s fixation with sperm count, which – at face value – doesn’t paint a clear picture of whether the sperm present is healthy, mutated, or immobile.
And while more research is needed, especially in the field of women’s reproductive health, studies can ascertain that ‘forever chemicals’ aren’t good for our bodies – and one would be wise to believe this doesn’t omit reproductive systems.
The bad news is, reducing our exposure to these chemicals won’t be easy as they are found in almost everything we use daily.
That said, it may be reassuring to know that the EU has pretty strict regulations for the use of phthalates. In fact, 40 percent of all product recalls in the year 2018 occurred as a result of their inclusion.
Across the pond in the US, regulations aren’t as strict – but the Consumer Product Safety Commission did ban the use of eight ortho-phthalates in children’s toys and child-care items in 2017.
Fast food restaurants are striving to abandon toxicity, with Burger King pledging to remove forever chemicals from its packaging by 2025. But medical scientists continue to strongly encourage cooking at home as often as possible to reduce chemical exposure.
Deputy Editor & Content Partnership ManagerLondon, UK
I’m Jessica (She/Her). I’m the Deputy Editor & Content Partnership Manager at Thred. Originally from the island of Bermuda, I specialise in writing about ocean health and marine conservation, but you can also find me delving into pop culture, health and wellness, plus sustainability in the beauty and fashion industries. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Meat, masculinity, and meagre waistlines are all on the rise – and the manosphere might be partly to blame.
It’s not just you. There’s definitely something in the air at the moment. Some might say it started with Pretty Little Thing’s controversial rebrand, in which the fast-fashion giant killed their ‘BBL party wear’ and produced a swathe of light-skinned, waifish models in its place. Others will tell you this was...
More than 550 days since the latest round of conflict between Israel and Gaza erupted, the scale of destruction and devastation on both a human and environmental level is almost unimaginable.
Journalist and author Matt Kennard has described the ongoing genocide in Gaza as a tripartition between the United States, Britain, and, of course, Israel.
America has provided the majority of arms (80%) to Israel since October 2023. Meanwhile, Britain’s ongoing...
A new bill has been passed in Hawaii that prevents those practising traditional midwife and reproductive methods from being subject to costly fines or prison time for trying to serve and preserve both their community and indigenous culture.
Compared with other states in America, reproductive rights in Hawaii seem relatively progressive, if judged in terms of abortion restrictions. Although the bar, admittedly, is lower than my pelvic floor.
Though the...
Since when did representation stop at skin tone?
In the distant land of pre-2015 texting, all emojis were jaundiced little blobs. That was until the great Skin Tone Update, which allowed users to transform their emojis into a spectrum of humanity – sort of.
Despite these ostensibly diverse offerings, one very obvious detail has remained overlooked in the world of digital mini people: hair.
Fast forward to 2025, and despite boasting a library...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
0 comments
