Tennis star Novak Djokovic became the target of public scrutiny and international support after the Australian government decided to cancel his visa. But now that a judge has overturned the decision, the player’s dispensation shines a light on our deeply flawed attitudes toward refugees and displaced people.
Serbian Tennis star Novak Djokovic had dreams of playing the Australian Open this week. But these hopes were prematurely dashed when the Australian government revoked his visa upon his arrival in the country.
Djokovic, who is unvaccinated and has expressed public disdain toward the Covid-19 vaccine (along with other dubious medical beliefs), was placed in temporary detention amid questions over his vaccine exemption.
In wake of the news, Djokovic’s supporters rallied outside a hotel in Melbourne where he was rumoured to be held.
Two disparate social causes have been drawn together through the Djokovic fiasco. Both fighting against the Australian government’s detention policies.
Chants to ‘free Djokovic’ flooded the streets, where – for years – pro-refugee protesters have called to abolish the hotels-turned-detention-centres holding asylum seekers.
On the second day of protesting last Friday, around 50 people gathered with anti-vaccine placards and images of the tennis star. Peppered amongst them were the pro-refugee posters, calling for the freedom of those trapped inside.
But unlike those who have gathered outside these hotels for years, calling out Australia’s archaic approach to the refugee crisis, it was a mere few days before the demands of Djokovic supporters were met by authorities. On Monday, to the surprise of many, a judge overruled the government’s decision and the tennis player’s visa was reinstated.
Djokovic has since admitted to breaking lockdown rules after testing positive for Covid-19, and lying on his travel form prior to entering Australia.
His reasoning for breaking isolation – to attend an interview – was that he ‘didn’t want to let the journalist down’, deciding that a mask would suffice in protecting others. Except, of course, when his photograph was taken – for which he dutifully removed his face covering.
Djokovic’s outrageous behaviour has rightly caused furore amongst global onlookers. It’s the same selfish attitude signposting our government’s lockdown parties, a belief that one’s own interests outweigh the sacrifices of the general population.
But Djokovic’s visa battle has also highlighted the fundamental flaws in our global response to refugees and displaced people.
Mark Kersten argues that the noise surrounding the tennis player’s detainment has distracted from the plight of thousands of asylum seekers who have been denied entry to Australia and remain held in detention camps across the country.
After only four days, Djokovic walked free, smiling at his supporters with a gleeful wave. Playing the role of hero – an oppressed figure who resisted tyrannic governmental powers and won.
Djokovic is no hero. He is rich, white, and adored by the general public. He is a hugely successful sportsperson, with the ability to defend himself in court and garner widespread support from a blindly defensive fanbase.
When he walked out of the Melbourne hotel in which he had been held, Djokovic left hundreds behind. Individuals who have fled war-torn countries in the hopes of a better life.
Australia boasts one of the most repressive policies toward asylum seekers, with a zero-tolerance approach for those who reach its shores.
These displaced people are unprotected by any body of law. Their living conditions are not monitored and are often inhumane – even deadly. Reza Barati, who arrived in Australia in 2013, was killed by two guards at the detention centre where he was being held just six months after his transfer.
Perhaps most alarming is that many international lawyers believe the conditions in Australian detention centres amount to international crime. As a former detention manager stated ‘In Australia, this facility couldn’t even serve as a dog kennel. Its owners would be jailed.’
The reality of these policies is distressing. But Djokovic’s association with asylum seekers by international supports, who have compared his treatment by the government to that of detained refugees, is perhaps most disturbing.
It reveals a gaping chasm in our social outlook: our inability to see – or simply care – about human rights violations when they don’t impact ‘tangible’ figures.
Djokovic has a public face, but thousands of others are reduced to statistics. Their experiences are so unfathomable and far removed from our own that we fail to comprehend our capacity to help.
Thousands have called out the hypocrisy of a government who has pushed stringent Covid-19 laws since the pandemic began, many tearing families apart.
But the public response to Djokovic’s case – both those in support of his plight for a visa, and those denouncing his ‘battle’ as a media farce – has proven that the same public scrutiny isn’t afforded to global refugees.
If only we applied the same energy, media coverage, and inflamed tweets to those who remain inside Australia’s hotels, some who have been held there for years. Perhaps we might someday see them emerge, with a smile and a wave, into the new life they dreamt of when they arrived.
I’m Flo, (She/Her) a Senior Remote Writer at Thred. I recently completed a Masters in Visual Anthropology, and seek to interrogate the ways digital spaces can amplify marginalised voices in the arts and cultural sectors. Follow me on LinkedIn or ping me some feedback via email.
A new report reveals millions of mums and children face quietly pervasive economic coercion – with family budgets being used as tools for domestic abuse.
Abuse isn’t always obvious – least not when it takes place in the domestic sphere. But new figures from the charity Surviving Economic Abuse (SEA) show that financial coercion is quietly affecting a staggering number of women and children. It’s a form of violence that remains underreported...
Lack of research and misdiagnosis is forcing couples, disproportionately women, into gruelling fertility treatment.
When a couple struggles to conceive, you would expect both partners to be treated equally during the process of diagnosis. But fertility care still leans heavily toward invasive focus on the woman and little attention on the man.
Not only does this imbalance place the onus of fertility struggles onto women, who then face an isolating sense...
On November 4, 2025, 34-year-old Zohran Mamdani was elected as the first Muslim mayor in New York City. And this is largely due to the influence of Gen Z.
After four long years of subpar mayoral leadership, New Yorkers, especially Gen Z, are ready for a change.
As of November 4, 2025, Zohran Mamdani is the change New York so desperately needed. The significance of the 34-year-old's mayoral win extends beyond...
On the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, UN Women reveal a disturbing rise in violent abuse toward women in digital spaces – with little consequence for perpetrators.
A few years ago, someone described the internet to me as ‘the world’s biggest public square,’ which sounded charming until I remembered that public squares throughout history have also hosted witch trials, duels, riots, and the occasional beheading.
The past year...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.
0 comments
