A new court ruling has decided that some species of bee can now legally be considered fish in order to provide extra protection under the California Endangered Species Act.
Consider yourself an expert on bees? Are you an academic on all things honey, hives, and bumbling?
Those clued up on the iconic winged pollinators may want to brush up on their knowledge after this weekend, as a California court ruling now classifies some species of bees legally as fish. Yes, fish.
Although it may sound absurd, the move is intended to help provide bees with extra legal protection and ensure theyβre covered by the California Endangered Species Act (CESA).
It had previously been decided by a lower court that CESA only protected βbirds, mammals, fish, amphibians, reptiles, and plantsβ and did not include bees or bugs.
This argument was pushed by agricultural organisations who would be impacted by extra regulations for insects. The Almon Alliance of California, the California Farm Bureau Federation, and five other agricultural groups had successfully confirmed that CESA does not protect insects in November 2020.
Now, the appeals court has allowed the Californian Fish and Game Commission to list four bumblebee species as officially βfishβ and therefore legally viable for extra protection β even though theyβre not aquatic.
They were able to do this because Californiaβs fish and game code β the outline in which plants and animals are protected β classifies a βfishβ as a βwild fish, mollusc, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animalsβ. Quite a mouthful, that.
Crucially, the term βinvertebrateβ within this definition is ambiguous enough to argue that bees should be included.
The four bumble species in question had already been classified as endangered, but were only regarded as βland invertebratesβ and not fish in 2018. This meant they werenβt covered by CESA as they were officially only insects. Still with me?
Judges ruled that βalthough the term fish is colloquially and commonly understood to refer to aquatic species, the legal definition is not so limited.β The room for interpretation and inclusion of bees as fish grants new protections that will help population numbers β which have been steadily declining in California due to climate change.
This new ruling will also be a setback for agricultural groups, who likely do not want added measures and restrictions on current agricultural practices. It fundamentally means that, in essence, bees are indeed fish in California. Which is hilarious.
Frogs technically fall under the definition of a fish too, as theyβre classed as βamphibiansβ- which are listed.
Pamela Flick, Californian program director at Defenders of Wildlife, said that it was a βgreat day for Californiaβs bumble beesβ in a statement. Letβs hope the bees β sorry, fish, I think? β are able to recover and boost numbers with these new protections.
Iβm Charlie (He/Him), a Senior Remote Writer at Thred. I was previously the Editor at Thred before moving to Bristol in 2024. As a music and gaming enthusiast, Iβm a nerd for pop culture. You can find me curating playlists, designing article headline images, and sipping cider on a Thursday. Follow me on LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
Africa's creative wave is the strongest it's ever been, and the world is paying attention.
As the pandemic ended, a global appetite for rawness and newness emerged, and Africa's artistic expressions are breaking away from the tired stereotypes to tell a different story, from the nightclubs of Lagos to the fashion houses of Paris, and everyhere in between.
African music, fashion, and art are coming into their own, changing the global...
James Gunnβs highly anticipated Superman film has not only revived the iconic hero but also ignited a political firestorm, particularly among right-wing Americans.
The debut of the new Superman film last week sparked global excitement, with many reconnecting with their sense of childhood wonder. This did not go without a major debate about who envisioned Superman the best, Zack Snyder or James Gunn.
Admittedly, each director brought a unique creative approach...
More celebrities are facing the public consequences for their morally deplorable actions, dispelling the culture of idolatry that presents famous people as a moral guide. However, a culture of racism and misogyny is still allowing culpable white men to evade the consequences of their actions.
Earlier this month, hip-hop artist Sean βDiddyβ Combs was convicted on βtwo counts of transportation for prostitutionβ
As Combsβ prosecution shows, fame doesnβt always protect...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.