Menu Menu

Do parenting influencers have a place on social media?

The recent sentencing of Ruby Franke, who dished out parenting advice online, has sparked conversation around the safety of so-called ‘sharenting’ via social media. 

When Ruby Franke was sentenced to four terms in prison, she had 2.3 million followers on a now-deleted YouTube channel titled ‘8 Passengers’.

The premise of the channel was to provide parenting advice, a phenomenon known online as ‘sharenting’. And to her millions of followers, Franke was – ostensibly – good at it. Alongside business partner Jodi Hildebrant, Franke had built a successful career off the back of her parenting videos, amassed a dedicated following that spanned the country, and firmly cemented herself as a parenting ‘influencer’.

But a few weeks ago, Franke was found guilty of child abuse and neglect. The sentencing came after her malnourished 12-year-old son escaped through an open window of Hildebrant’s home and asked a neighbour for food. He had open wounds and was bound with duct tape.

When police arrived, they found another of Franke’s young daughters in a similar condition, and Franke and Hildebrant were quickly taken into custody.

After her arrest, Franke’s eldest daughter Shari, aged 20, shared a now-deleted Instagram image of police officers with the caption ‘Finally’. Her response implies long-term abuse by Franke and a lack of intervention by authorities.

The case has raised questions around the role of parenting influencers and the dangers of ‘Sharenting’ online.

We live in a world constantly permeated by social media, making the line between public and private increasingly fragile. Franke highlights how oversharing can lead to severe consequences – not just in terms of her own punishment, but in the spread of misinformation to others.

Franke’s family wrote letters to the Utah judge prior to her sentencing last week, explaining that she had been ‘deeply brainwashed’ after meeting her business partner Jodi Hildebrant.

‘She was so delusional. She was so deeply brainwashed we could not recognise her’ they wrote.

‘During her career on YouTube […] I never had any concern for her or her children, ‘ Franke’s brother, Beau Griffiths, said in a written statement.

‘I was impressed by how generous and kind she has always been to my own children. Many of the teachings of the Connexions program [Hildebrant’s parenting classes] were reasonable and good,’ he continued. ‘Unfortunately, as I later discovered, this is what made the program so dangerous’.

Both Franke and Hildebrant received identical sentences after pleading guilty in December, with law enforcement describing the ‘concentration camp-like setting’ they had created for Franke’s children.

Claims that Franke herself was brainwashed by online parenting advice demonstrates the very real dangers of platforming parents on the internet.

The ways we choose to parent are incredibly subjective and personal, and placing one person on a pedestal for their parenting style creates a risky hierarchy and a false sense of superiority for figures like Franke.

This only exacerbates the chances of misinformation – if everyone is looking to you for advice, if you’re achieving success and validation on a daily basis, you may be less likely to question your own actions. Add extremist authority figures like Hildebrant into the mix and the world of ‘sharenting’ becomes a landscape of bad advice and – at worst – gravely dangerous consequences.

Critics of ‘sharenting’ have also warned of the dangers of invading a child’s privacy and ethical violations.

As parents focus more on their online image, the risk of neglect and harm to children is increased. Every family is different, and what works for one may not work for another. Yet, influencers like Franke often present their parenting style as the only way, which can make other parents feel inadequate or guilty.

In turn, when a parenting influencer like Franke has a large following, others may be less likely to question their advice.

Franke’s case serves as a reminder of the dangers of ‘sharenting’ and the risks of letting influencers dictate parental behaviour. Social media platforms need to take steps to ensure that content shared by parenting influencers is based on reliable information and promotes healthy parenting practices.

Parents, too, need to be cautious when seeking advice online, making sure to verify information and seek guidance from reputable sources. It goes without saying that the well-being of children should never be compromised for the sake of maintaining an online persona.

‘For the past four years, I’ve chosen to follow counsel and guidance that has led me into dark delusion’ Franke said at the sentencing last week.

‘I was led to believe that this world was an evil place filled with cops who control, hospitals that injure, government agencies that brainwash, church leaders who lie and lust, husbands who refuse to protect and children who need abuse’ she added.

Hildebrandt also offered a statement saying she desired for the children to ‘heal physically and emotionally’.

Accessibility