Do Gen Zers care about the truth online?

With a newspaper, the editor chooses the content and the views. There’s a relationship between the editor and the reader, and over time that relationship might steadily incorporate a level of trust.

But with social media, well, how could you ever build trust in an algorithm? Do any of us really know how they work, or what metrics they use for promoting one video and hiding another?

For Gen Zers (and for everyone else, too) there’s too much obscurity and noise out there. It’s hardly surprising that Gen Zers show so much apathy online or regularly turn to absurdist humour. Sometimes all you can do is shrug or laugh.

There are some rays of light, despite Google’s findings. A lot of the content we consume is from influencers and creators we choose to follow. Putting the intentionality back is important here, since it allows for a relationship capable of trust.

You can decide for yourself if your favourite online historian, neuroscientist or cultural critic has the right credentials and motives. So it’s not entirely true that we’re just consuming blindly from the algorithm.

Checking the comments isn’t all bad, either. After all, the scientific method basically relies upon broadening your data inputs and doing your best to disprove your hypothesis.

Checking the comments is a quick (if fallible) way of seeking out objections and alternatives to the original article’s main point of view. We build trust by being sceptical, and Gen Zers are finding novel ways of doing that.

So: there’s some cause for concern, but it’s really not all that bad.

Gen Zers go online for lots of reasons, and failing to critically assess everything we see isn’t an issue so long as we’re not embracing it either.

As a generation, we’re pretty good at treating everything with a pinch of salt. Sure, we might not fact check a TikTok, but most of us aren’t going to base our lives around those TikToks, either.

Previous research has found that most disinformation is consumed by a minority of users who choose to seek it out. The majority of Gen Zers aren’t out here being radicalised.

There’s still a lot to be concerned about. A generation that seeks primarily to avoid boredom through short-form content, and thus avoids anything longer and more long-term beneficial, might face some problems further down the line — but Gen Z is not a monolith.

Go online and there are loads of positive trends, growing communities, interesting conversations being had all the time.

I’ve seen some TikToks recently with the sentiment: ‘Realising I believe everything I see on TikTok just like my parents believe everything they see on Facebook.’

There’s a lot of self-awareness in the discourse online, and many people are good at pointing out our collective flaws and finding positive solutions. There’s still hope for the future, then.

After all, nothing is set in stone.

Gen Z around the web

Meet generation boomerang (the face)

In the 1980s, almost half of 18-to-34-year-olds lived in a property they owned. Now, around 40 per cent have moved back in with their parents – if they’ve ever moved out at all. Why does it feel like the rules of adulthood are being rewritten, and not in a good way… Read more

Understanding the Gen Z-led protests in Kenya (thred)

In recent weeks protests have been sweeping across the country, led by Gen Zers who are deeply unhappy with a new Finance Bill. Read more

Why Gen Z’s Trust is so difficult for brands to come by (morning consult)

Apparently as a generation we also have trust issues: 95% of the brands Morning Consult looked at have lower trust ratings with Gen Z compared to all U.S. adults. Read more

It’s a Brat Summer (papermag)

Summer 2024 is lime green and it’s all down to Charlie XCX. Read more

Are Gen Z picking up the phone less? (thred)

In a world of instant messaging, is the old-fashioned phone call becoming a relic of the past? Read more