Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

The media has missed the point of the Epstein story

Coverage has fixated on big names and sordid details, but the focus should remain on Epstein’s victims. 

If you’re an internet user you’ve probably scanned at least one headline pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein in the past week. The child sex offender is back in the news due to newly revealed details around his crimes, and mounting pressure to release the infamous ‘Epstein files’ – a hypothesised document containing the names of high-profile clients to whom Epstein trafficked young girls.

The flurry of interest in Epstein’s circle has also kicked up a notch following the publication of the late Virginia Guiffre’s memoir Nobody’s Girl, the most high-profile of Epstein’s victims and a long-time advocate for survivors of sexual abuse. Guiffre’s book also triggered Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s ousting from Buckingham Palace last month and the removal of his royal titles shortly thereafter.

But despite Guiffre’s raw and vulnerable telling, this royal reshuffling and the subsequent fixation on who Epstein’s clients might have been has overshadowed – once again – the voices of those he abused. Only this time it isn’t the man himself doing the silencing but the mainstream media.

This week a flurry of emails were leaked detailing Andrew’s involvement with Epstein along with allusion to President Trump’s association with the financier and his girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell – who’s currently serving a prison sentence for her central involvement in Epstein’s trafficking ring. These emails have drawn a string of high-profile names to the surface of the story, from Michael Wolff to Peter Thiel and Larry Summers.

‘There are other names you might not be seeing at all,’ writes Jennifer Weiner for The New York Times. ‘Courtney Wild, Rachel Benavidez, Michelle Licata, Maria Farmer, Annier Farmer, Liz Stein, Jess Michaels, Marina Lacerda, Danielle Benksy, Anouska De Georgiou, Shawna Rivera.’ These are just some of Epstein’s many victims, scores of whom have come forward and accused Epstein of sexually abusing them.

The media coverage of Epstein and his crimes has become a who’s who of powerful men, essays sparing no detail about their social circles, careers and illustrious lifestyles. And the public is lapping it up. In our rush to demonise these purported villains we are extending their oppressive arm and leaving victims in the dark – disarming their capacity to speak their truth.

While the world has always been quick to spectacle over substance, particularly where high-profile crime is concerned, the disregard for Epstein’s victims comes even after they’ve displayed immense coverage in speaking out. ‘They’ve appeared in documentaries and podcasts. Ms. Giuffre’s memoir is currently on best-seller lists,’ says Weiner.

Amid the hysteria surrounding the release of the Epstein files, a public service announcement by these women slipped largely under the radar. It urges viewers to ask their Congressional representatives for a ‘yes’ vote on the Epstein Files Transparency Act Bill, which President Trump is expected to act on shortly.

This PSA is one example of the ways we can enact meaningful, substantial change for those whose lives were torn apart by Epstein. But instead we are watching the spats and downfalls of the world’s most powerful with popcorn in hand.

The most abominable take on the Epstein news came from a The New York Times essay bemoaning the loss of a bygone New York – a Manhattan power scene that the latest Epstein emails ostensibly reveal.

In its roundabout efforts to vindicate Epstein and his inner circle, the piece reads more like a twisted love letter to the city’s past – a specific point in time when figures like Epstein were at their strongest.

At one point, Shawn McCreesh even takes the opportunity to call out staples of the New York dining scene. He lists off a string of high-profile names against a backdrop of slick office lunches and ‘quintessential New York nights’ as if writing some kind of Graydon Carter-penned travel guide. It’s hard to believe, three-quarters of the way through the piece, that what you’re reading is a profile on the world’s most prominent sex offender.

Of course, those responsible should be held to account – and there’s something dismally satisfying about watching a once-successful monster choking on humble pie. But it doesn’t sit right that this spectacle comes at the expense of the real people involved, the women who are the real heart of this story.

I’m hesitant even to use the word ‘story’ – it invokes fiction and fabrication. There’s no need to fluff the details or exaggerate the parameters of Epstein’s evil world (not least because it represents the worst of humanity) and to do so implies the need for some kind of titillation. Seeking entertainment from the destruction of thousands of lives is a cruel depravity – but it is, sadly, the natural response.

As Weiner points out, ‘it’s hard to turn out the gossip and listen instead to the people who paid the price […] little can compete with the revolting sight of sophisticated, powerful people fawning over a moral leper.’

And most of all, she continues, ‘it’s hard to listen to the women because their stories are wrenching. And heartbreaking.’

I started Nobody’s Girl shortly after its release, and despite being a voracious reader I’ve yet to finish. I have to put the book down every few pages to catch my breath, so horrific are the details of Virginia Giuffre’s life-long abuse.

But it’s vital that we do read them – we owe it to a woman who was brave enough to share the darkest details of her life in the hopes of saving others from the same fate; a woman who didn’t live long enough to see if that would happen.

The same goes for all of Epstein’s victims and every person who’s been impacted by sexual violence. It is they who have struggled to have their voices heard. Only when we listen to them will change be made possible.

Enjoyed this article? Click here to read more Gen Z culture stories.

Accessibility