Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Superman ignites fury among right-winged Americans

James Gunn’s highly anticipated Superman film has not only revived the iconic hero but also ignited a political firestorm, particularly among right-wing Americans.

The debut of the new Superman film last week sparked global excitement, with many reconnecting with their sense of childhood wonder. This did not go without a major debate about who envisioned Superman the best, Zack Snyder or James Gunn.

Admittedly, each director brought a unique creative approach to the character. Still, it was refreshing to see the new film capture the hopeful spirit of the original Superman comics, along with the similarities to Christopher Reeve’s iconic portrayal.

Since it hit theatres worldwide, the film amassed a fair share of criticism and praise, whether it was about the suit or the Fortress of Solitude’s architecture. Nevertheless, the criticisms didn’t get to the point where it offended anyone…did it?

Well, as it turns out that the MAGA community was very much offended, but for another reason. If you have not watched the movie, warning: spoilers ahead.


James Gunn’s vision

Since his introduction, Superman has symbolized hope and kindness, qualities that James Gunn aimed to highlight in his portrayal. In contrast to Zack Snyder’s darker, more brooding interpretation, the new version was designed to capture the optimism reflected in the hero’s iconic emblem.

To Gunn, Superman is the ‘story of America’. He went on to state that the character is an immigrant who populated the country, and that for him, the movie is primarily a story of the value of basic human kindness.

So, you can see where the right-wing community began to take exception to the movie. That’s not all that riled them up, either.


Real-world parallels

The film features a fictional war between wealthy, US-backed Boravia and the poorer Jarhanpur, widely interpreted as a parallel to Israel and Palestine. Under the guise of a humanitarian mission, Boravia invades Jarhanpur with Luthorcorp’s help, only to reveal Lex Luthor’s secret arms deal in exchange for half the conquered land of Jarhanpur.

The narrative drew strong parallels to the violence in the Israel-Gaza conflict and the war in Ukraine. It even evoked powerful imagery of occupation, military aggression, and civilian suffering, mirroring the real experiences of the victims.

In this context, Superman’s intervention in the Boravia-Jarhanpur war symbolizes the urgent need for humanitarian action amid conflict, rather than more violence. This focus shifts the character’s image from just a patriotic symbol to a broader, universal emblem of morality.


The far-right outcry

Obviously, this did not sit well with right-wing Americans, many of whom had a lot to say about the movie. In what it thought was smart wordplay, Fox News mocked the film, calling it ‘Superwoke’, and going on to criticise its ‘pro-immigrant’ themes. MAGA has been known to throw the term ‘woke’ around quite a lot to describe something that doesn’t fit their ideology.

Most of these commentators took a jab at Gunn’s description of Superman as an immigrant, arguing that the politics-infused portrayal represented a left-wing agenda. Trump’s former adviser, Kellyanne Conway, even dismissed the film as a lecture rather than a form of escapism, saying that people do not go to the movies just to have ‘somebody throw their ideology’ at the audience.

In an opinion article, Rex Hupkke stated that ‘a proper superhero would be flying around America rounding up migrants while wearing a mask that hides his identity and bravely violating the rules of due process’. He ended the article by asking Superman to ‘keep his left-wing morals to himself’.

Another major turn-off for the far-right was the film’s supposed depiction of their ally Israel’s brutal occupation and the suffering of the Palestinian people.

Let’s clear something up. James Gunn himself stated that he wrote the movie way before the Middle Eastern conflict started in 2023. He claims he even tried to move away from any parallels as much as possible. When asked about the MAGA community’s response to the movie, Gunn replied that the movie was for everyone and focused on kindness, not politics.

On another note, what’s ironic is that right-winged Americans have on many occasions referred to immigrants in the US as ‘aliens’, ignoring its derogatory nature. Now, when an actual fictional alien is being portrayed as an immigrant, it apparently qualifies as a problem.

At the end of the day, one can’t control what others see. The far right sees a politically charged film, while James Gunn wants the world to see a film about the power of kindness.

The choice lies with the viewer, but those who embrace Gunn’s vision see a renewed Superman: a symbol of hope and goodwill, and exactly what the world needs today.

Accessibility