Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Opinion – Biathlete Sturla Holm Laegreid’s speech was a hot mess

The Olympian’s admission of infidelity came at the wrong time in the wrong place. By framing it as a romantic gesture, Laegreid embodies everything wrong with patriarchal, ego-driven ideas of love. 

Sturla Holm Laegreid’s speech was not the grand romantic gesture he thought it was. Before the 20km individual biathlon took place at the Winter Olympics in Italy last week, you’d probably never heard of Laegreid. He’s a successful Norwegian athlete, granted, but outside of devout winter sports fan groups he had a pretty low profile.

That all changed when he won the bronze medal. But it wasn’t Laegreid’s impressive performance that stirred a media storm. At the post-race press junket he tearfully admitted – live on television – to cheating on his long-term girlfriend.

It had been ‘the worst week of [his] life’, Laegried told reporters. The bronze medal, it turned out, was no salve for the suffering he’d endured after telling his girlfriend about an affair three months prior.

‘There’s someone I wanted to share [this win] with who might not be watching,’ the biathlete said, in a scene pulled tactlessly from the midway point of a Richard Curtis movie. ‘Six months ago, I met the love of my life – the most beautiful and kindest person in the world. Three months ago I made the biggest mistake and cheated on her.’ Get the tiny violins out.

But wait, Laegreid had more heart-shatteringly romantic words to bestow. ‘I had the gold medal in life,’ (this metaphor was particularly low hanging fruit, but I’ll let it slide; the man was clearly going through it) ‘and I am sure there are many people who will see things differently, but I only have eyes for her,’ he continued in the speech that felt like it would never end.

The world collectively curled their toes as Laegried went on blubbering and mumbling about all the ways he’d screwed up. Besides being awkward for everyone involved, the whole performance took the limelight away from Laegried’s teammate, and directed it straight at his poor ex-girlfriend – who by Laegreid’s own account had already been put through enough pain to make the grown man responsible an inconsolable mess.

I’ll hazard a guess that Laegreid regrets using such a public moment to reveal his very private thoughts. Perhaps he got caught up in the emotion of it all. But it’s the subsequent response that’s really surprised me. I expected the moment to go viral, of course – it was completely bonkers. But I can’t say I predicted the backlash Laegried’s received as a result. And not that I wish him to suffer, but I admit it reassured me.

Laegried’s actions were unprecedented for the context in which they took place. But I’ve seen this kind of behaviour time and again in my everyday life. Men using their own misgivings as a fine excuse to partake in heavy-handed navel gazing.

Narcissistic self-soothing is dressed up in tears of regret. Any semblance of an apology is buried deep beneath a sprawling monologue in which he recounts all the ways his mistakes have affected him (not the person on the receiving end of them).

I willfully encourage any man to cry in public. God knows we need to chisel away at the patriarchal ideal of masculinity that deems emotion the domain of women – for everyone’s sake.

But when I saw Laegreid up there, lower lip wobbling like a pre-schooler, I was reminded of a line from Nora Ephron’s autobiographical novel ‘Heartburn’: ‘Beware of men who cry. It’s true that men who cry are sensitive and in touch with their feelings, but the only feelings they tend to be sensitive to and in touch with are their own.’

I’ll caveat by saying that this quote is pulled from the point in a fictional story when the pregnant protagonist has just discovered her husband’s affair. I don’t truly believe that all weeping men are self-involved villains. But Laegreid’s behaviour was entirely off the mark.

The gaping hole in this whole fiasco? Laegried’s ex-girlfriend, whose thoughts and feelings were clearly thrown to the wayside when her cheating former partner decided to air their dirty laundry on international television.

As Grazia’s Nikki Peach writes, ‘she is the victim in this situation, grappling with her partner being unfaithful and then failing to tell her until the week of one of the biggest moments of his career. By declaring his love for her and confessing to cheating on live TV, Laegried is positioning himself as the victim.’

I doubt many of the media outlets frothing at this real-life, alpine telenovela have spared a thought for the ex-girlfriend’s feelings. I imagine I’d be pretty humiliated if I were in her shoes.

She’s had her agency stripped from her in every conceivable way – from being cheated on, to spoken about in public, and backed into a corner by Laegreid whose confession of ‘love’ came at a time when any negative response from his former girlfriend would threaten to ruin his Olympic career.

Even in 2026, it seems some men still believe their feelings deserve the ultimate podium.

Enjoyed this? Click here for more Gen Z focused culture stories.

Accessibility