Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Broadcasters failed everyone at the BAFTAs

The BBC’s handling of a racial slur was damaging for all involved. It’s proof that inclusivity amounts to more than just a seat at the table. 

Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo endured a living nightmare when they took to the BAFTAs stage last week.

It should have been a night of glorious celebration. Their film, Sinners, was up for a bevy of awards (it’s also bagged a record-breaking 16 Oscars nominations) and co-star Wunmi Mosaku took the prize for Best Supporting Actress in a surprise win.

But when Jordan and Lindo took to the stage to present an award, they heard one of the most violent racial slurs shouted from the audience. The moment was captured on camera, and was kept in the final broadcast despite a two-hour delay. Mind you, that didn’t stop the BBC from cutting Akinola Davies Jr. ‘s ‘Free Palestine’ statement in his acceptance speech for My Father’s Shadow. 

Jordan and Lindo handled the situation with incredible grace and professionalism, and host Alan Cumming quickly apologised to viewers for any offense caused. The slur, it turned out, had come from Tourette syndrome campaigner John Davidson, on whom the biographical film I Swear is based.

‘Tourette syndrome is a disability, and the tics you’ve heard tonight are involuntary, which means the person who has Tourette syndrome has no control over their language. We apologise if you are offended tonight,’ Cumming read from the teleprompter.

Indeed, guests had been warned about Davidson’s condition on arrival. He was introduced to a round of applause before showrunners explained that involuntary vocal outbursts might be heard throughout the ceremony, but that the Baftas are an inclusive space in which all people are welcome.

Davidson suffers from a rare form of Tourette known as Coprolalia, a specific tic disorder leading to utterances of obscene and socially taboo language. By the time he shouted a racial slur at Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo, he’d already displayed several involuntary tics. The word ’boring’ was heard during one of Alan Cumming’s monologues, which received a laugh from the audience. Others triggered a more bristled response – like when Bafta chair Sara Putt was told to ‘shut the f*ck up’.

As Jason Okundaye wrote in The Guardian, Tourette syndrome is often met with this confused, awkward and even amused feedback. It’s a misunderstood and antisocial condition that can cause upset and serious offence – and is sadly damaging for everyone involved.

During a 2011 documentary, Ruth Ojadi, a Black woman with Coprolalia, described how the condition had disrupted her life. ‘No race, no denomination, no gender, no sexuality, no religion is safe,’ she said. Such a condition should only be met with compassion and understanding.

And this makes the BBC’s handling of Davidson’s words so disappointing.

For starters, there’s the response. Alan Cumming can’t be vilified for reading off of a teleprompter, but why apologise to the audience at home before acknowledging the two Black men involved?

Jordan and Lindo were subjected to a word that carries centuries of generational trauma. And their feelings weren’t considered or protected.

The same can be said for Davidson. The activist had every right to be in attendance – a film based on his life was being awarded. That same film depicts Davidson’s years-long campaigning for the Tourette community, calling for better education around the condition. But for the Baftas to act as the ‘inclusive space’ they claim to be, organisers needed to more than just give Davidson a seat in the audience.

Parties have been failed on all sides in this mess. It’s one of those rare instances where multiple truths can exist at once. And thanks to the BBC’s mishandling, disgusting instances of racism and ableism have coalesced in the aftermath.

Davidson is facing online vitriol (he also felt compelled to leave the show midway through for fear of offending other guests), and Jordan and Lindo have been left to navigate the trauma of hearing a racial slur live on camera.

The blame should ultimately sit with the Baftas. If you’re going to include a neurodivergent person in any setting – as you very well should – then adequate steps should be taken to protect both them and others. Showrunners should have spoken with individuals like Jordan and Lindo beforehand, explained the possible outcomes, and asked how they would like the BBC to proceed.

Instead Davidson has been left to handle the situation alone, as people online accuse him of racism and question his condition. He released a statement shortly after the awards aired, saying he was ‘deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning.’

Lindo also told reporters that Bafta had failed to speak to him or Jordan after the incident.

Organisers have since apologised for the slur and removed it from the edit on BBC iPlayer. But it’s much too little too late. If anything, this could have been an opportunity for education and understanding – a chance to build on the work Davidson had dedicated his life to and a space to protect Black people from the historic racial violence that films like Sinners so deftly explore.

Instead it proved institutions like the BBC are more prone to slapping an inclusivity sticker on the box and leaving out the contents.

Enjoyed this? Click here for more Gen Z focused culture stories.

Accessibility