As Israel unleashes its wrath on Gaza and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine rages on, war crime accusations have become a central topic of international discussion. Let’s look at what acts are considered war crimes and who, historically, has been held accountable for committing them.
Although the condemnation of various acts committed during war has existed throughout history, concepts of what constitutes a war crime were not developed until the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century.
During this time, international humanitarian law – known as the law of armed conflict – was officially set out through the creation of various treaties, most notably those formed at The Hague Convention and The Geneva Convention.
These treaties aim to prohibit parties engaged in war from using certain means and methods of warfare with the goal of protecting human rights, which we explore in detail later on. While these two treaties are certainly useful tools, there remains no single international document that fully encapsulates and recognises all war crimes.
With classifications and definitions of war crimes spread out across various treaties, condemning acts of war becomes a bit like piecing together a puzzle without having a clear reference photo on the front of the box.
This is especially the case when factoring in the strategic and existing political relationships between international countries, which frequently result in a country’s leaders being hesitant to hold their allies accountable.
Let’s get into the specifics of what kinds of acts are considered war crimes and which organisations are responsible for punishing offenders.
There is a long list of actions that have been deemed war crimes. Let’s start with crimes against humanity.
Targeting civilians intentionally is considered a war crime under international law. This includes the murder, rape, torture, deportation, and enslavement of any civilian populations which are committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack on a country.
The persecution or genocide of a specific group of people based on their national, ethnic, racial, or religious identity is also illegal.
On top of this, it is illegal under international law to direct attacks against civilian objects, or rather infrastructure used by regular people on an everyday basis. Buildings meant to be protected from damage caused by war, include houses, hospitals, schools, museums, and places of worship.
There is also a list of weapons and biological agents that are banned from use during war, according to international law. These bans were put in place after World War I, but the law was updated in 1993 to prevent the development, stockpiling, and transfer of such substances.
These are just a few acts of war that are considered punishable by international law, a list that is updated on a regular basis to include modern weaponry.
Who is held accountable and how?
Today, war crimes are punishable in two ways: death or long-term imprisonment of combatants, soldiers, and or political leaders themselves.
To charge individuals with committing war crimes requires conducting a hearing in the International Criminal Court (ICC), which was founded in 2002 for this purpose.
The powers held by the ICC are recognised by 122 countries that signed the Rome Statute in support of it. Those who haven’t signed, including world superpowers such as the United States, Russia, and China state that they want the power and control over the prosecution of their criminals and do not want to have the input of the ICC.
Only the nations that have agreed to and signed the ICC treaty are obliged to adhere to the authority of the court. As a result of this, military personnel from non-participating territories are unable to be held to a trial regardless of the war crimes they may have committed.
Getting soldiers, armies, or countries on trial for war crimes is not an easy feat. Like regular criminal trials, the context of certain acts must be considered. There also must be evidence of a war crime taking place beyond a reasonable doubt.
The ICC also prides itself on being objective and comprehensive. This means that if one country accuses another of committing war crimes, both parties involved in the case will be investigated for their actions.
This makes the process extremely tedious, creating huge limitations for the ICC, especially when countries (Russia and the US for example) do not operate under its jurisdiction. It largely grants them impunity from alleged war crimes.
Even for countries that support the ICC, the thorough nature of such court hearings can see investigations into war crimes take decades.
A full list of cases conducted by the International Criminal Court can be viewed here.
How politics slows a rush towards accountability
International political relations have proven to convolute to what degree nations are willing to accuse one another of war crimes.
For example, President Joe Biden labelled Russian leader Vladimir Putin as a war criminal without hesitation. It’s no question that the hostile and turbulent relationship between the United States and Russia enables Biden’s willingness to make this statement.
When it comes to Israel’s actions on Gaza, however, things have been more difficult. The US-Israel relationship is an extremely strong one both politically and in a military sense – with America sending $4billion a year to fund Israel’s military organisation – as this is mutually beneficial for both parties.
Getting any American president to explicitly condemn Israel outright would be a bit like asking Bonnie to turn on Clyde – despite clear evidence that war crimes have taken place, including bombings of civilian homes, hospitals, and UN schools.
It’s anybody’s guess whether the ICC will be able to condemn actions now taking place in the Ukraine or Israeli war. Even if it is able to, reaching final conclusions may take many years.
War in the age of the Internet
In a time when anybody with a smartphone can double as a photojournalist, global citizens are now able to watch acts of war play out in front of our eyes.
Depictions of war crimes can’t be as easily hidden, but unfortunately, context is more easily lost or easily misconstrued. Much of this convolution is intensified with help of mass media, making the truth harder to find and justice more difficult to achieve.
Dissecting any media is an added layer of evidence for the ICC to consider, a task that is difficult even in domestic trails.
In the end, any decided punishment for actions that cause the loss of lives, homes, and infrastructure can never bring those things back. In war, there are no winners.
Everyone involved is made a victim when peace loses its place as a priority.
I’m Jessica (She/Her). Originally from Bermuda, I moved to London to get a Master’s degree in Media & Communications and now write for Thred to spread the word about positive social change, specifically ocean health and marine conservation. You can also find me dipping my toes into other subjects like pop culture, health, wellness, style, and beauty. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
On Thursday, at a courthouse in Avignon, France, Dominique Pelicot was handed 20 years in prison for aggravated rape following over a decade of drugging and abusing his ex-wife, Gisèle Pelicot, and inviting over 50 men to rape her.
Among the 50 co-defendants, 46 were convicted of rape, two of attempted rape, and two of sexual assault.
The judge handed down sentences ranging from three and 15 years, with a...
As many as forty people between the ages of 22 and 58 will be spending Christmas in UK prisons. This record-breaking figure is attributed to the high number of arrests at climate change protests and demonstrations related to Israel’s actions in Gaza.
This year, a record-breaking number of UK protestors will be spending Christmas behind bars.
With forty activists between the ages of 22 to 58 locked up across Britain in...
The strictest law in Iran's history concerning the compulsory veil was supposed to be enacted on December 13. In a hopeful turn of events, global outrage has forced the administration to hold off on the bill's implementation.
Participating in digital activism in all possible ways - only to rarely witness positive outcomes - may make you wonder, ‘What's the point?’ Recent events in Iran, however, have given us renewed hope...
The controversial technology, which is intended to limit the effects of climate change by reflecting sunlight back into space, might not be such a great idea after all.
As we know, hundreds of the world’s leading climate scientists expect our planet to breach the internationally agreed 1.5C threshold by 2027 and temperatures to rise to at least 2.5C above pre-industrial levels this century.
This is due to emissions...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
0 comments
