Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Is there a connection between psychedelic use and eco-activism?

What are the current psychedelic renaissance’s effects on environmental activism and how can the nature-connectedness that’s bolstered by hallucinogenic drugs galvanise social movements and ultimately inspire faster action against the climate crisis?

We’ve recently seen a growing acceptance within scientific fields that controlled psychedelic experiences can successfully transform mental health.

Despite persistent legal complications and public stigma surrounding their use, scientists are still dedicated to changing our minds about their therapeutic potential. Their benefits exist outside the scope of medical settings, too.

In the last year, two peer-reviewed studies have uncovered evidence that psychedelics might influence pro-environmental behaviours and a philosophical paper published in early 2022 argued in favour of using them as biophilia-enhancing agents.

In other words, LSD, psilocybin, and DMT (among numerous others) offer a promising solution to widespread detachment from the climate crisis. This connectedness feels particular necessity as we approach multiple β€˜irreversible’ tipping points far faster than the UN expected.

According to its latest IPCC assessment, the many repercussions that were once deemed avoidable no longer are, and it will be the world’s most vulnerable communities that bear the brunt.

Regardless of how alarming this is, however, a Pew Research survey from 2017 found that while three-quarters of Americans supposedly feel concerned about personally caring for the planet, just one in five are actually motivated to make an effort daily.

At the same time, the 100 companies responsible for 71 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions take no decisive action to curb their impact, nor do governments hold them accountable.

On this note, it’s thought that dissecting how hallucinogenic drugs amplify the sense that the Earth is part of us, our bodies, our lives, and that we are a part of it – thus enabling us to view it as an extension of ourselves – may alleviate policymaker’s inertia in responding to the ecological emergency.

β€˜We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us,’ wrote Aldo Leopold in 1949. β€˜When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.’

Psychedelics, Psychology, and Identity in the Environmental Movement

Echoing this is Sam Gandy, a scientist at the Beckley Foundation, which is a psychedelic research group in the UK.

β€˜The ecological devastation we are experiencing now is a side effect of a nature disconnection,’ he says. β€˜Reconnecting us to nature is something I see as one of the most important things we can be working towards right now as a species.’

This radical idea that psychedelics could pose a better means of combatting the climate crisis than the development of innovative tech, for example, was most recently brought forward by Gail Bradbrook, who co-founded Extinction Rebellion.

Experimenting with plant medicine to figure out β€˜the codes for social change’ that she needed to unlock, Bradbrook’s healing journey was the catalyst behind XR’s launch into the bold, international movement we know today.

There is hope, then, but only if the focus of key individuals can be shifted towards prioritising the planet, as Bradbrook’s was when she succumbed to the ayahuasca-induced urge to dedicate the rest of her life to environmental causes.

Yet encouraging those in power to trip on certain hallucinogenic drugs is nothing short of controversial, of course.

That’s why Gandy’s newest work in this field, conducted alongside a team from the University of Greenwich, has sought to rewrite the narrative.

Titled Transpersonal Ecodelia: Surveying Psych-Induced Biophilia, the project concludes that psychedelic experiences have the β€˜capacity to elicit a connection with nature that’s passionate, protective, and remains significantly elevated for as long as two years after the experience, even among those who were not previously nature-oriented.’

Of the belief that the β€˜amount of good that can come from this is massive,’ he cites psychologist Matthias Forstmann’s explanation that psychedelics promote nature-connectedness via ego dissolution.

Tripping for the Planet: Psychedelics and Climate Activism | Atmos

Blurring the line between where we stop and the outside world begins, Gandy considers the phenomenon (which is much-discussed in the drug-research world) a crucial mechanism in fostering an empathetic self-nature overlap.

β€˜If I feel close to or at one with nature, I start to ascribe human-like attributes to nature,’ seconds Forstmann. β€˜Like the capacity to feel pain or to be sad. If I feel that nature is suffering, then maybe I want to treat it better.’

Communicating this must be done in an emotionally compelling way, says Gandy, especially because psychedelics are a class-A controlled substance in most countries and are not suitable for everyone – namely those with a family risk of psychosis.

It’s vital to acknowledge that this shift doesn’t have to be instigated by everyone.

The so-called 3.5 per cent rule, as proposed by Harvard political scientist Professor Erica Chenoweth, postulates that only a tiny majority of the population has to campaign for something in order for critical mass to be achieved.

For a more rapid and more impactful transformation, therefore, impetus would be most effective if it came from the top, which would involve world leaders, institutional investors, and business executives turning their attention to the psychedelic to eco-activism trajectory.

So, if we’re not quite ready for full-fledged decriminalisation, says Gandy, reminding those with the power to generate tangible change at large of the importance of building a symbiotic relationship with the Earth is a start.

Because as anthropogenic global warming on a devastating scale looks inevitable, the potential of psychedelics in solving the climate crisis at least provides us with a glimmer of optimism in the age of empty promises and ongoing inaction.

β€˜Good nature conservation is about changing minds,’ he finishes. β€˜Psychedelics change the substrate of the mind. From that, I feel that they do make a mindset change more accessible. They by no means guarantee it but provide more fertile terrain for the possibility.’

Accessibility