Menu Menu

Is COVID-19 causing a mental health crisis?

For millions of people who struggle with their mental health, lockdown heralds a huge and unplanned challenge. But some medical experts argue that depression and anxiety during a pandemic are features of mental wellness, not mental illness.

Understandably, the physical health of the world is currently at the forefront of everybody’s minds. During the COVID-19 outbreak we have to heal our bodies and ensure the safety of our fellow citizens as a first port of call. But with social distancing now passing from weeks to months, it’s not just the hospitals that are finding themselves overwhelmed but mental health services too.

We’ve never lived through anything quite like this before. I’m not, and never have been, a libertarian (at least not to the extent of these morons), and I absolutely believe in the duty of care governments and institutions to shut down non-essential services, thereby keeping their people safe. It’s important, and where necessary, it should be enforced punitively (especially against aforementioned morons). But that doesn’t make it an easy thing to do.

For many with pre-existing mental health conditions (approximately one in four people in the UK), being forced into lockdown has caused a rupture in day-to-day coping mechanisms that’s been hard to reconcile with a healthy state of mind. The unique concerns that come with a health crisis have been catalysts for a whole new set of collective anxieties that will likely continue even after the lockdown ends.

Coronavirus Lockdowns Could Last for 18 Months: U.K. Report | Time

COVID-19 is causing an uptick in loneliness, anxiety, and grief across the planet, even in those who would consider themselves mentally healthy. People aren’t just isolated from proper care, but from each other. There are those stuck inside with abusive partners or living in already strained relationships, and those managing addiction who risk relapse without in-person meetings or access to rehab. School and work closures around the world look like they might stretch on for months, and the volatile markets and sudden job losses have added a layer of economic insecurity that wasn’t a factor in people’s lives just a few weeks ago.

As a result of this, mental health professionals are seeing their resources stretched thin. Demand for remote therapy has spiked considerably in the UK and the US. Talkspace, the text and video chat counselling service endorsed by Michael Phelps, has seen a 65% increase in consultation requests since mid-February. Brightside, another popular digital therapy platform, has seen a 50% bump in customers since the start of the quarter.

Some of the most endemic problems these services are finding are unprecedented waves of loneliness in communities, swathes of grieving families, countless addicts in fear of relapse, and anxiety contributing to an increase in sleep disorders.

The pandemic hasn’t just upended our daily routines, but it’s has disrupted how our minds work too. ‘We’re constantly drawing on past experiences to make predictions about the future,’ said Mimi Winsberg, a psychiatrist and co-founder of Brightside told Bloomberg Businessweek. ‘That feature of our brains is working in overdrive, if you will, because many of the things that we have learned to expect are suddenly different.’

What It's Like Living in Italy During Coronavirus Lockdown | Time

According to a recent paper published by the US government’s Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCV), the coronavirus has triggered a ‘heightened public mental health crisis’, with ‘generalised fear and fear-inducing overreactive behaviour’ becoming common in the public. Certainly, data seems to lead us to that conclusion.

Since the report was published, however, disparate groups of mental health professionals have denigrated it as alarmism, warning that labelling COVID-19 a ‘mental health crisis’ could in fact do more harm than good.

Jonathan Gadsby, research fellow for mental health and learning disability nurse at Birmingham City University, joined mental health experts from the universities of East London, Liverpool, and Roehampton in issuing a joint statement warning that, ‘The experience of anxiety, depression and other expressions of a very troubled mind cannot easily be said to be ‘mental illness’ during this coronavirus pandemic nor in the context of other emergencies we currently face.’

The report claims that, in fact, the heightened sense of dismay currently being felt in our collective consciousness might instead be a sign of ‘enhanced connection and concern for other humans, other species, and the planet’, as well as an acknowledgement of the fragility of our ecosystems. ‘All if those’ Gadsby and his colleagues continue, ‘…are features of mental wellness, not mental illness, crucial for understanding oneself and the world, and for energising the solutions we need.’

The dangers of labelling something an epidemic without due recourse are manifold. Misleading headlines and reports claiming that the health crisis now extends to our minds send a very troubling message.

Firstly, it inclines us to offer the wrong solutions. At the moment, meeting people’s basic needs by disseminating food, clothing, PPE, and other essential resources should be top of the list when it comes to coronavirus coping mechanisms. Declaring a mental health epidemic, however, could shoot psychiatric drugs to near the top of that list, leading people to quick and permanent solutions to potentially temporary problems.

Local Red Cross under fire over China coronavirus donation mess ...

Moreover, by blaming the current mental upset solely on the conditions of COVID-19, we miss an opportunity to channel these feelings into finding solutions for the very real social problems highlighted by the pandemic. As I wrote about last week, social distancing and the current economic recession have shone new light on inequality both within western society, and between the west and the east.

People who live in poor communities or countries, have little or no job security, and who live in cramped conditions (like refugees and asylum seekers) have been far more negatively affected by the virus than the wealthy. They’re more likely to have lost loved ones or their jobs, and to be in dangerous situations during lockdown. Consequently, they’re more likely to become victims of this mental health ‘epidemic’.

We shouldn’t manufacture a parity between those who are feeling lonely and alienated during the lockdown but who are otherwise safe, and those for whom any instability is life threatening. For the latter group, COVID-19 is merely exacerbating problems that already existed, and we should be using this quiet period to think more carefully about long-term solutions to the basic inequalities that fissure our society, and that cannot be cured with anti-depressants.

It’s true that when we eventually emerge from our domiciles into a bright new day some damage control will be needed for those who’ve found the lockdown period particularly stressful or upsetting. Some people will have developed new anxiety disorders around the threat that deadly viruses pose, whilst others will have slipped back into addiction, and others still will have found their relationships irreparably strained. This is cause for concern, and heralds difficulties ahead, but it doesn’t constitute a mental health epidemic. Our current anxiety levels are merely a symptom of COVID-19, not a new pandemic in and of itself.

Accessibility