Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Half of British women turn to therapy and martial arts over safety fears

A demand for self-defence is the product of cultural self-blame. 

If you’re a woman, you’ve probably walked alone with your keys between your fingers at least once. Your heart rate has quickened when you hear someone approaching from behind after dark. You’ve pretended to take a phone call when heading home at night.

These small rituals may sound overblown to a cisgender man, but they’ve become an unwelcome mainstay of womanhood. And it turns out they’re no longer enough, either.

A new report has found that nearly half of women in the UK (47%) are spending money either on therapy or self-defence classes largely due to safety concerns. It’s a strange thing, to live in a country where personal safety has become something women squeeze into their personal calendars alongside pilates and dinners.

The reasons are hardly surprising. You only need to skim a few headlines to see the justification. In London, reports of muggings, assaults, and public harassment have become grimly routine. The BBC recently reported more calls for self-defence training in schools, citing fears of rising attacks on women in urban areas.

In Bournemouth, martial arts instructors have been adapting traditional Chinese techniques specifically for women after a surge in demand. And on Reddit, women are trading tips on the best self-defence programs like they’re shopping for a new hobby. When searching for safety becomes a lifestyle category, something has gone very wrong.

Of course, there are real, tangible benefits to these classes. They build muscle memory, sharpen instinct, and for many women, offer a rare sense of agency in a world that constantly chips away at it. Therapy, too, plays an important role. It helps process trauma, manage anxiety, and reclaim control.

But none of this is free. Most self-defence programs charge between £60 and £200 for a course, and therapy can set you back around £100+ a session in many clinics.

The original report states that 78% of women in the UK worry about travelling alone in the dark for fear of being followed (54%) or attacked (50%).

E-J Roodt, co-founder of Epowar – the platform that commissioned the research – said: ‘This growing fear amongst women is having both a mental and financial impact.

‘Our research has revealed that the majority of women in the UK are relying on a text or a call from a friend to know they’re safe, even though a large portion (a third) never hear back. What this doesn’t do is provide women with the real protective measures and evidence that’s needed to prevent violence.’

While it’s certainly true that programs like therapy and self-defence can offer tangible solutions to the threat of violence, the uptick in women seeking them out is only placing the burden on their shoulders.

The result is a cultural pivot where individual solutions are positioned as moral imperatives. We praise the woman who learns to fight back, and we blame the one who didn’t. Had she just taken that Saturday self-defence workshop in Hackney, perhaps she’d be fine. Maybe she should have downloaded a safety app.

What we do not do is address the root. The majority of violent crime in this country is committed by men. The majority of victims are women.

Comment
byu/1DarkStarryNight from discussion
inunitedkingdom

Yet instead of investing heavily in preventive, community-based programs that educate boys and young men about consent, boundaries, emotional regulation, and conflict resolution, we pour money into reactive policing. None of which address the pipeline that produces violence in the first place.

And let’s be honest: what’s being sold here is not protection but palatable power. It’s empowerment that doesn’t disturb any real systems; don’t ask why the very institutions that failed to protect you are now profiting from your fear.

As a society, we’re in danger of accepting violence against women as an inevitability and placing the onus on women to survive it more gracefully. It’s a logic that slots neatly into neoliberal feminism. But a braver strategy would start with funding – not just in the form of subsidised and widely accessible self-defence programs, but for early intervention programs aimed at boys (evidence shows that violence is often learned young.)

What’s needed is not just safer women, but fewer violent men.

Until then, we remain in a cycle where the state gestures at protection while outsourcing the real labour of safety to women themselves. And that is not empowerment.

Of course women will continue to sign up for self-defence and therapy. And they should have every right to access those services, free of stigma or financial strain. But learning to navigate danger is not the same as living without it.

Accessibility