Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Is The Traitors a crucible for unconscious bias?

The show is beloved nationwide, and has since spread overseas. But the experiences of Black contestants consistently mirror everyday life. 

Are you affronted by the suggestion that The Traitors – arguably Britain’s most beloved TV show – has an unconscious bias problem? If yes, you’re probably ignorant to the ways in which racial bias constantly shapes society. By which I mean, you’re probably white.

You may think this claim ‘too woke’, or ‘overblown’. But all it takes is a glance at the numbers.

The Traitors hit our screens in 2022 with a simple yet compelling format: a group of strangers move into a grandiose castle to complete a series of challenges and win up to £120,000 – with the catch that a number of traitors hide amongst them, hoping to sabotage their efforts.

Since it first aired, the show has exploded in popularity. It’s now one of the biggest shows on British TV and a unicorn for the BBC, drawing huge viewing numbers despite the rise of streaming. It’s also been picked up across various markets, including the US and New Zealand.

What makes this show so engaging is that it ostensibly tests our capacity for judgement – all players are ignorant to the traitors’ true identity and thus weeding them out becomes a task unclouded by preconceived notions or long-held beliefs. Or so we’d like to think.

As it turns out, no amount of smoke and mirrors can deflect from society’s unconscious bias. Across every iteration of The Traitors, the earliest ‘faithful’ contestants to be banished by their #comrades are disproportionately Black.

In the UK’s current civilian series, Judy – a Black woman – was the victim of the first banishment. Another Black woman, Nettie, was the first murdered.

The same pattern emerged in the celebrity version, which aired last October. Niko Omilana was voted out in episode one, and by episode three Tameka Empson had been shown the castle door.

It’s easy to dismiss this theme as a coincidence, but as Micha Frazer-Carroll argues, it highlights the ways race frames our society – and the everyday experiences of minority ethnic groups.

‘It’s often people of colour or otherwise marginalised people who are told there’s something the other players just don’t quite trust about them,’ writes Frazer-Carroll.

‘A disproportionate 40 per cent of those who were kicked out of the game within the first three murders/banishments were minority ethnic players.’

This has become such a predictable element of the show that it’s hard to ignore how blatantly it displays subtle prejudice. These small ideas we hold about others – often so subtle we aren’t aware of them – go on to drive our decision making and inevitably morph into institutional bias.

Viewers have pointed out the pattern of behaviour on social media, highlighting the ways The Traitors acts as a microcosm of wider society. Small judgements are representative of micro-aggressions that impact marginalised groups in every aspect of their daily life.

‘Being a Black woman at work means being judged negatively for behaviour that would be innocuous in another person,’ writes journalist Athena Kugblenu.

‘We shouldn’t be surprised when our experiences on competitive TV shows or the football field are consistent with everyday life.’

Comparing the behaviour of The Traitors contestants to the lived experiences of marginalised groups, Kugblenu draws on the stop and search tactics of MET police.

While players were unable to give tangible reasons for their suspicion of Black players Judy and Ross in the latest series, a 2023 report found that when police only have suspicion to go on, they stop and search minority-ethnic people disproportionately compared with white counterparts – and ‘note one force could explain that either.’

Kugblenu questions whether these dynamics are more amplified on the show because suspicion is inevitably at its heart. But despite contestants no doubt playing in good faith, ‘the words we hear resonate with many Black viewers.’

This is a crucial point – that when we act under the influence of racial bias we are often completely blind to it. We believe we’re good people with honest intentions. But this is what makes structural racism so pervasive and powerful – only when we question our existing beliefs can it be dismantled.

To claim you are entirely unbiased is simply untrue. As human beings, we’re all biased in some way. Whether it’s instantly assuming a couple in a novel is heteronormative, or that a pre-school teacher is a woman – we all grow up influenced by societal norms.

Addressing them isn’t an admission of inherent evil, it’s an act of recognition – one with the power to impart real change.

Enjoyed this? Click here to read more Gen Z focused culture stories.

Accessibility