Menu Menu

Reverse marketing and the rise of the anti-ad

In the always frantic race to sell, advertising firms are targeting Gen Z through ‘self-conscious’ marketing.

Do you guys remember the anti-joke? It was a big thing in the early 2010s, relying on the element of surprise to create humour. The anti-joke would start off following conventional joke formats, for example ‘why did the chicken cross the road?’, and then follow this up with an unexpected, often true-to-life scenario. ‘It didn’t have a reason, chickens aren’t capable of critical thinking’.

The point of the anti-joke is to satirise the absurdity of the joke’s original premise. It’s essentially reverse psychology, and it’s a tactic that is increasingly being used by advertising agencies.

Over the past few years you may have seen some of these adverts popping up on your screen or adorning buses and billboards…

Here we have Brandable Clothing and their self-consciously low-effort Halloween campaign.

Taco Bell ‘going dark’ on Facebook to promote their app.

Hans Brinker Budget Hotel wholeheartedly embracing their reputation as a low budget establishment.

And Newcastle Brown Ale openly stating their desire to spend as little as possible on ads.

These are what we call anti-marketing campaigns: the art of selling via non-selling. They deliberately rail against the accepted norm of advertising as a part of our day-to-day experience, questioning the mechanisms of the medium whilst all the while advertising their product. It’s a tricksy form of new-age marketing that has captured the attention of the youth market.

 

Why has this come about?

Last year, Samsung reported falling smartphone and tablet sales despite increased advertising expenditure. This was likely a painful pinch for the tech giant considering the sales figures of competitors Apple and Xiaomi, who spent considerably less on advertising.

Rosser Reeves – the man who came up with the Unique Selling Proposition – once said that ‘the people who read and remember your advertising may buy less of your product than people who are not aware of your advertising at all. Your advertising, in other words, may, literally, be driving away customers.’

But it doesn’t appear that not advertising at all is the answer, either. Whole Food Market was one of the few consumer product businesses listed in the Fortune 500 without running any ads on a national scale in the US last year. But their poor performance on Wall Street in 2019 has left them no choice but to launce a new $15-20 million campaign.

So, making too much noise doesn’t necessarily equate to return on investment, and having no voice at all may incur massive costs. What’s a marketer to do?!

They’re to advertise at the same time as making fun of brands who advertise.

 

A paradigm shift?

It’s unsurprising that this brand (so to speak) of advertising resonates particularly with young people. Gen Z have been raised in a global financial crisis surrounded by an unstable workforce, and thus are understandably sceptical of advertising. Why, at a time of austerity, do we need $1 trillion industries telling us to buy more?

The progress towards social media marketing and influencer culture, which has blurred the lines between person and product, has made young consumers savvier regarding the fakery of digitized content. Gen Z are naturally suspicious of branded posts, and it’s this mistrust that the anti-ad relies on. Anti-marketing campaigns hope to separate themselves from the pack by openly and honestly acknowledging the act of advertising. The theory is that the more honest they are, the more they’ll be respected – and who doesn’t want to buy from a brand they respect?

The trend is being billed as a ‘return’ to the original aim of marketing. Kalle Lasn, founder of viral marketing group Adbusters, stated to the Economic Times that ‘advertising needs to become what it was many years ago… that is ‘here’s a good bargain’, ‘here’s what this product can do’. Ads were more functional, cheaper, and not an end in itself’’. The implication here is that ‘big’ story-based advertising has strayed into ostentation and deceit.

 

Advertising agencies ruthlessly poking fun at their competitors is nothing new. Advertisings faults and trends have been criticised and mocked by insiders time and time again. Toronto based John St. have mastered the art of satires on advertising themes, creating a mockumentary short on a fictional ‘cat ad agency’.

The parodies are seriously entertaining and have won John St. multiple awards. But it’s important to remember that these videos, too, are advertisements – for the agency itself.

This begs the question: is there something dishonest about brands poking fun at ads… in order to sell you something?


Are anti-ads really anti-establishment?

The anti-ad wants to make all other marketing look absurd, wasteful, and unnecessary through implying that the brand being advertised has barely spent a penny, trusting in the quality of their product and the discernment of the consumer. In reality, anti-marketing campaigns are just as expensive, and just as meticulously thought out, as regular ones.

Let’s take the new UK campaign for BrewDog craft beer, for example.

Whilst BrewDog have undoubtedly saved money on design teams and production, they have spent money on one of the most expensive slots on TV this year, launching the campaign during one of the first episodes of Game of Thrones. Meanwhile, posters are running on the sides of buses across London and Manchester (in fact, one of these posters prompted me to write this article). Clearly, no expense has been spared.

Despite what BrewDog may want you to think, ‘THE MOST HONEST AD EVER’ campaign (yes that’s what it’s called) was not first sketched on the back of a coaster during a raucous night at the pub. BrewDog has enlisted the help of creative heavyweights Uncommon to come up with the idea. Whether an ad is a static image of beer and text on a screen or a mini-blockbuster, the creative insight and strategy doesn’t come cheap.

BrewDog is no longer the small underground establishment it once was. It’s currently the best-selling craft beer in the UK, with 70 bars and more than 1000 employees globally.

BrewDog, and many of the other brands using subversive advertising, feel as if they’re trying to hold on to the status of a disruptive challenger in their respective industries whilst also trying to become mainstream brands. And, if you think about it, there’s nothing less ‘honest’ than that.


In conclusion

In a way, the reason anti-ads work is also the exact reason they’ll never truly ‘fool’ us. The anti-ad relies on our discernment, and expects us to apply this discerning gaze to them as well as their competitors. Their hope is that we’ll credit their attempt to communicate directly with the consumer despite acknowledging that their motive is to sell us something.

It’s a slippery slope. The more meta advertising gets, and the more acceptable it becomes to advertise subliminally, the less noticeable modern-day ads could become. The knowledge that direct advertising works less on Gen Z could lead agencies to turn towards other cognitive manipulations, such as preying on guilt or anxiety (two things Gen Z have in droves) to sell products.

But that’s just speculative. For now, we see nothing inherently wrong with the anti-ad, and appreciate creatives in this industry attempting to break the mould and give us something a little different on our daily commute.

Accessibility