Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

What could a global tax on those with $5m wealth pay for?

Globally, there are 3.6 million people that have accumulated more than $5m in wealth – more than 2,600 of them being billionaires. If there were an annual tax on these individuals, here’s what it could pay for. How’s vaccinating the entire planet, for starters?

Global wealth distribution is up there as one of the very tetchy-est subjects, so prepare to be triggered.

Around the world, there are 3.6 million people today who have accumulated more than $5m in wealth. Of this percentage, 2,600 are billionaires with a combined worth of $13.76 trillion. The current omega of Sillicon Valley, Elon Musk, reportedly has a net worth of $242bn.

When talking numbers like this, money starts to seem like an abstract concept to the average person – like trying to comprehend the size of the sun. In reality, of course, we’re all aware that these crazy figures would have a transformative effect on some of the world’s biggest issues.

As we navigate the midst of a pandemic, and scramble to prevent our climate from warming to dangerous levels, senators, public figures, and the likes of you and I – assuming you’re not Jeffrey Bezos – continue to call for more progressive wealth tax systems befitting our current situation.

With such changes, data from a consortium of companies including, Forbes, Fight Inequality Alliance, Institute for Policy Studies, and Oxfam has outlined the extent of what could be achieved. Spoiler: it’s a damn lot.

The report claims that with a 2% tax on wealth starting at $5m, a 3% tax above $50m, and a 5% on over $1bn, we would raise approximately $3.6 trillion a year.

Though these estimations aren’t completely infallible, anywhere in the ballpark of this sum would comfortably cover the cost of vaccinating the entire world from Covid-19 (appx $27.8bn), and providing universal healthcare to developing countries (appx $440.8bn). Surely, this is what taxes were actually created for, no?

Now snap back to reality. Oxfam’s report from late January outlined how the world’s 10 wealthiest men – including the likes of Bezos, Musk, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerberg – have more than doubled their fortunes since the pandemic began. On the other side of the coin, there are over 3.2bn people living below the breadline on less than $5.50 a day, according to the World Bank.

If you wish to enrage yourself by delving into financial chasms between social classes on a country-to- country basis, the report breaks it all down. Knock yourself out.

In the US, where the report stems from, the idea of more severe tax brackets is one becoming increasingly popular with people of influence and the wider public. Regularly advocated for by senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders, as much as 71% of American voters are reportedly keen on the change.

That’s hardly surprising when around 0.002% of the population holds more wealth than the entire bottom 60% of US society. In regard to the bigger picture, those with $50m and above hold 6.33% of all global wealth.

In the aim of narrowing wealth disparities, it certainly doesn’t bode well that Davos has been postponed yet again, or that the UK is verging on raising national insurance taxes. Suffice to say, the report is particularly relevant now.

Speaking on national insurance fees, British entrepreneur and founding member of Patriotic Millionaires UK, Gemma McGough says: At a time when simply living will cost the average household a further Β£1,200 a year, our government cannot expect to be trusted if it would rather tax working people than wealthy people.’

β€˜If they do anything in the next few months, they should do this: rather than raising national insurance, tax the rich – tax us – instead.’

Accessibility