Menu Menu

COP28 moves to protect the natural world: historic or not enough?

While conservation groups have praised the inclusion of biodiversity and a 2030 global deforestation goal in the UAE consensus that emerged from this year’s summit, concerns remain.

Last December, delegates from almost 200 nations at the ‘last chance’ COP15 conference in Montreal reached a ‘historic’ deal to halt biodiversity loss.

Pledging that at least 30% of the world’s land, inland waters, coastal areas, and oceans would come under conservation by 2030, the agreement set out to reverse decades of environmental destruction threatening the Earth’s species and ecosystems.

It came amid plummeting insect numbers, acidifying seas teeming with plastic waste, and the rampant overconsumption of the planet’s resources as the global population soared past eight billion.

The hope was that it would put humanity on a path to living in harmony with nature by the middle of the century and prevent the human-caused sixth mass extinction event that scientists have been warning against for some time now.

A year on, and this has been revisited at COP28 in the UAE.

Under the consensus that emerged on the 13th, governments will now be obliged to take the natural world and carbon stores such as forests into consideration while developing their next round of nationally determined contributions to the Paris agreement.

The new plan notes the need for more financial resources for nature and implementation based on ‘the best available science as well as Indigenous people’s knowledge and local knowledge systems.’

It also ‘emphasises the importance of conserving, protecting, and restoring nature and ecosystems towards achieving the Paris agreement temperature goal.’

This will include ‘halting and reversing deforestation and forest degradation by 2030, and other terrestrial and marine ecosystems acting as sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases and by conserving biodiversity,’ in line with the COP15 targets.

‘The text’s emphasis on halting and reversing forest degradation, alongside deforestation, by 2030 leaves no ambiguity about the urgency of global, multisectoral action to protect high-integrity forests in order to meet the goals of the Paris agreement,’ says Jennifer Skene, natural climate solutions policy manager at the Natural Resources Defence Council.

‘The international community is stripping away the veil over industrial logging, creating a pathway for action on forest protection defined by equity and accountability.’

As it’s the first time the 2030 deforestation goal has been included in a UN agreement and is therefore more binding, the move has been praised by conservation groups who believe it could help link nature and climate more closely, rather than the two subjects being treated separately.

However, many have expressed concerns that this is futile as long as reluctance to phase out fossil fuels prevails.

This is because failure to control the emissions responsible for eroding forest resilience to drought, fire, and disease threatens to tip carbon-rich ecosystems into becoming a major source of global heating.

‘The agreement gives a glimmer of hope with ambition to halt deforestation,’ says Toerris Jaeger, director of Rainforest Foundation Norway, ‘but the slow progress on fossil fuel is a threat to the rainforest.’

Accessibility