New research into the industryâs complex global supply chains has revealed that a number of well-known companies could be indirectly spurring the rainforestâs destruction.
Post-Cop26, itâs no surprise that fashion â notorious for its substantial environmental impact â has been in the limelight.
Yet while itâs undoubtedly progressive that the industry is no longer able to conceal the level at which itâs contributing to the climate crisis, news of its persistent malpractice is quickly becoming enough to deter me from ever buying clothes again.
Just last week, I was outraged to discover that Chileâs Atacama Desert is currently inundated with thousands of tonnes of unsold garments from around the world, so youâll understand my sheer disheartenment this morning when reading that major brands could be playing a key role the Amazonâs destruction.
This is according to new research into fashionâs complex global supply chains, which has shown that a number of well-known companies (including Zara, Nike, Prada, LVMH, and Adidas) are indirectly spurring the rainforestâs deforestation due to their connections with the production of leather.
The study, conducted by NGO Stand.earth, found more than 50 brands to have ties with JBS, Brazilâs principal leather exporter and one renowned for its damaging carbon footprint.
âThe findings are surprising, in part because a number of the brands surveyed have recently announced policies to untangle themselves from actors along the supply chain that contribute to deforestation,â says Greg Higgs, one of the researchers involved in the report.
âWith a third of companies surveyed having some kind of policy in place, youâd expect that would have an impact on deforestation, but the rate of deforestation is increasing, so the policies have no material effect.â
Although a direct link between the felling of trees and these retailers has not been demonstrated so far, what is clear is that as long as consumer demand for wallets, handbags, and shoes is being met, products will continue to go from cattle, to slaughterhouse, to tannery, to manufacturer.