Menu Menu

Uber has lost its licence in London, again

Following a formal assessment, Uber will no longer be allowed to operate in London after 14,000 rides were taken with uninsured drivers in 2019 so far.

Getting about in big cities has changed considerably over the last five years or so, thanks to a meteoric rise in on-demand taxi services. Apps such as Uber allow anyone with a smartphone to order a ride wherever they are in real time, with a car usually pulling up to your location within five minutes. It’s quick, easy, and cheap – all qualities that fit Millennial and Gen Z lifestyles nicely.

All of that convenience doesn’t come without compromise, however. Uber in particular has faced scrutiny from governments and traditional taxi companies for failing to efficiently regulate its services, offering subpar safety standards, and underpaying its drivers. Nowhere has this been more prevalent than in London, where Uber has already had its license removed once and was given a temporary extension to try and improve back in 2017.

That, apparently, hasn’t happened. Uber has now had its license revoked for a second time following a ‘string of failures’ according to Transport for London. It will appeal the decision, and can continue to run until the final outcome, but as things currently stand the company will no longer be allowed to operate in London.

Why is this happening to Uber?

Put simply, Uber has a business model that is near impossible to fully regulate and keep track of. For several years, each driver was considered a self-employed ‘partner’, which meant that they were not entitled to sick pay, annual leave, or the National Living Wage.

An employment tribunal ruled that all of Uber’s drivers in the UK, of which there are 40,000, are not working freelance and are, in fact, employees. This was contested at the end of 2018 by Uber but it lost its appeal, meaning that UK drivers now actually have some rights. Which is a good thing.

However, the sheer number of drivers under the Uber name, and the lack of rigorous training and license practices that traditional taxi services use, means many incorrect or unsafe trips can easily occur without the company knowing. A security lapse in Uber’s database in 2018 allowed anyone to upload their own photos onto other people’s accounts and, as a result, over 14,000 trips have since been taken by uninsured or incorrectly identified drivers. It’s a bit of a hot mess, basically.

Who will this affect most?

Unfortunately, this decision is likely to most affect the drivers who rely on Uber for their wages. Employees already have to deal with precarious working conditions and ever-changing terms to their job status, and this latest decision could see over 40,000 people out of work in the UK, many of whom will still have car leases to pay.

The Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWGB) are seeking an urgent meeting with Sadiq Kahn, the London mayor, to discuss a plan to protect these drivers should the decision be completely finalised. It’s a scary situation – one that could see tens of thousands out of work almost overnight.

This entire situation flags up glaring issues with the gig economy, whereby employees are working under a freelance basis. The structure allows for big businesses to wipe their hands clean of employer responsibilities, and legally argue that each person under their branding is a ‘partner’. It leaves rampant opportunity for abuse and mismanagement, leaving many low-wage workers stripped of the employee rights they should be getting.

Uber acting as though drivers are ‘self-employed’ is disingenuous because these workers are still representing a company and are expected to work strictly under Uber’s terms. Similar apps and businesses, such as Deliveroo, Addison Lee, and Amazon, all use this structure for their own advantage.

It has its benefits, such as increased flexibility, but often these gig employees are expected to work extensively long hours for less than minimum wage. Currently, over 5 million people work under this business model in the UK, and it’s only set to rise. We should at least be careful as to how big company’s use this approach to employment, and let Uber’s current situation serve as a warning. Without proper regulation standards and employment rights, things can quickly derail (sorry to mix transport metaphors), leaving both riders and customers out in the cold.

We’ll have to see whether Uber can get its services to continue to run in London. Either way, this could have significant ramifications for gig economy companies in the future – and the rights of those who work for them.

Accessibility