China has promised that it will begin lowering emissions by 2030 and will be carbon neutral by 2060, but is it all just political posturing?
Xi Jinping has stated that China will aim to be completely carbon neutral by 2060 in an address to the UN General Assembly in New York. He also pledged that the country would hit peak emissions by 2030 at the very latest and called for all countries to achieve a ‘green recovery for the world economy’ after the pandemic subsides.
Despite how unexpected this announcement is, it’ll no doubt be welcomed by international climate change organisations. China has one of the biggest growing economies in the world producing 28% of all global greenhouse emissions, and is the biggest polluting country on Earth by far.
Any indication that it’ll slow down its production rates and begin to use alternative energy solutions is good news. The global effort to reduce greenhouse emissions will likely gain renewed momentum during a particularly difficult time period too, even if it means China will now have increased political leverage over the climate question.
The pandemic this year has stifled climate talks and emission goals – the COP26 has been delayed until 2021 and although global pollution levels dipped at the start of the year they have since climbed back up to pre-Coronavirus levels.
China’s emissions continued to increase from 2018 to 2019 and we’ve still got a few years to wait until that number starts to decrease. It still has a ways to go in proving itself to truly be green – and its full intentions remain unclear.
It’s easy to see why China chose to announce these ambitious new targets now.
Trump’s administration has been disastrous at tackling climate change and he has denied its existence many times. Most recently he dismissed reports that California’s annual forest fires have become steadily more severe as a result of increasing global temperatures, instead opting to comment that ‘science doesn’t know’.
To add to these eye-rolling public statements, he has regressed the United States’ climate goals and severely damaged the country’s progress during his four years in office. He’s rolled back Obama’s methane regulations, opened the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, rejected stronger air pollution standards, and has pushed to limit the government’s environmental review policies. It seems his priority will always be oil companies and economic growth, regardless of how awful the environmental consequences are.
This is not an approach that is popular with the rest of the world, especially with young voters and Gen Z. In fact, for most of us younger folk, it is our number one political concern and we remain the most urgent voice that leads the charge for actual geopolitical change.
It’s no coincidence that Xi Jinping decided to jump onto the world stage with news about the climate merely minutes after Trump threw several hyperbolic and unhelpful Coronavirus accusations at China. The two countries are already on shaky ground, and Xi Jinping knows that committing to climate action now will give his party and country more influence over environmental bodies in the future to get ahead of the US.
This isn’t strictly limited to the climate, either. As Washington pushes forward with rejecting international bodies like the Word Health Organisation and continues to marginalise itself from the rest of the world, it leaves an opportunity for China to become more influential and affluent in global politics. Most recently Xi has been stressing for peace, co-operation, and diplomacy. Even if the reality in China doesn’t necessarily correlate with his rhetoric, it’s obvious that Xi understands how to play the international political field far better than Trump.
Couple this with its sheer economic might, and China could easily wind up becoming a larger co-operative voice with democratic nations than the United States, which would be a bizarre state of affairs given that it’s the so-called ‘land of the free’.
Are China doing enough to warrant any praise?
However, while marching into the UN and talking big about climate goals is all well and good, it’s worth keeping in mind that China hasn’t actually done anything yet and continues to pump out emissions at staggering rates.
In the first half of 2019 its emissions grew by 4%, and the overall global CO2 emissions for last year rose directly as a result of China, despite the rest of the world reducing its fossil fuel usage. In many ways it remains the number one nemesis of global progress despite the sudden apparent change of heart.
The promise of peaking emissions by 2030 also doesn’t scream urgency. The change needs to happen right now and the thought of emissions rising exponentially for another ten years doesn’t fill me with a whole lot of hope. Carbon neutral by 2060 is a decent target, but when Greenland’s ice sheets are near enough disappearing as we speak, I can’t help but feel more needs to happen sooner.
So, while this new and unexpected shift from China is certainly welcome from an environmental perspective, it should be approached with caution. Motivations for throwing its hat into the emissions reduction ring will almost certainly be for political gain and as of yet it hasn’t done anything to prove it can put its money where its mouth is. Until the reliance of fossil fuels actually slows down, until the numbers actually start falling, until we see some real, tangible, meaningful shift, I’ll be holding my applause.
Even if Xi delivers on these promises, his country still has a lot to answer for. What about the millions of detainees stuck in ‘re-education’ camps? The aggressive crackdown on Hong Kong protestors? The data mining from TikTok? Trump may be an aggressive lunatic, but China is still an authoritative state that does not abide by democratic rules.
It’s worth remembering this as Xi talks about peace and diplomacy. Giving China more of an influence on our climate change goals is a good thing for the planet’s future, but it could erode some of our democratic principles. The good news is that if Joe Biden wins the 2020 election climate change will be back on the agenda, and we may see the US embrace communication with other nations once again.
The best outcome here is a Democratic victory come November. So, for the love of all that is holy, make sure you go out and vote.
I’m Charlie (He/Him), a Remote Writer at Thred. I was previously the Editor at Thred before moving to Bristol in 2024. As a music and gaming enthusiast, I’m a nerd for pop culture. You can find me curating playlists, designing article headline images, and sipping cider on a Thursday. Follow me on Twitter, LinkedIn and drop me some ideas/feedback via email.
At a time when many Brits can’t afford to support themselves or their families, is it any surprise that in-store theft is on the rise?
The news cycle seems to be preoccupied with updates regarding grocery prices and cost of living surges. Only yesterday I looked at my phone to find a notification that my water bill was increasing from April. Sigh.
For the average Brit, shopping has become a daunting...
The Green Proving Ground program was established in 2011 and was designed to test and implement emerging technologies for reducing energy waste in buildings. It appears the Trump Administration has cancelled it.
According to a new report by Fast Company, it seems the Trump Administration has cancelled the Green Proving Ground program.
Launched in 2011 and run by the General Services Administration (GSA) and the Department of Energy (DOE), the...
A new study has found that human brains contain high levels of microplastics that are increasing over time. It has higher concentrations of the material than any other organ.
The human brain contains higher concentrations of microplastics than other organs, according to a study published Monday in the journal Nature Medicine by the University of New Mexico Health Sciences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiEBEGKQp_I
The new research found that microplastics in human brains have increased...
Now that everything costs more than it ever has, are our romantic relationships more impacted by class than those in a Jane Austen novel?
If you’re at all aware of Jane Austen, even if you’ve never read one of her novels, I won't be giving away any spoilers by revealing that they get married in the end.
Edward and Elinor. George and Emma. Edmund and Fanny. Frederick and Anne. Henry...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok