Menu Menu
[gtranslate]

Social media, free speech, and white supremacy

Is hate the price we must pay for a connected world? We analyse the connection between social media and extremism.

As the world continues to reel from the heart-breaking events in Christchurch on 15th March, Facebook has announced changes to its policies regarding racist content.

Previously, Facebookโ€™s algorithm hunted out only explicitly white supremacist content – posts that actively promoted the belief that white people are superior to other races – whilst regarding white nationalist and white separatist content – aka the belief that races should live separately, or that a white majority should control predominantly white countries – as legitimate. As of next week, Facebook will no longer draw a distinction between the two.

The confirmation that white nationalism cannot be meaningfully separated from hateful racism is long overdue from Facebook. The company have finally put to bed the unconvincing argument that โ€˜national prideโ€™ means the same thing coming from white people as it does from non-whites given the cultural dynamics of our planetโ€™s racial history.

The announcement follows accusations of insufficiently filtered content on Facebook, Reddit, and YouTube. Many argue that, had these platforms employed the same level of regulation for white supremacist content as they did with Islamic extremist content, the Christchurch shooterโ€™s rampage would never have been allowed to spread.

Each of these websites have since expressed their determination to eradicate any trace of the shooterโ€™s attack. YouTube tweeted immediately after the attack, โ€˜Please know we are working vigilantly to remove any violent footage.โ€™

Itโ€™s unquestionably true that social media outlets, in particular Reddit and content sharing boards like 4chan, have yet to adequately grapple with the role they have in facilitating radicalisation and recruitment. But what is becoming increasingly clear is that tech companies now have a content moderation problem that is fundamentally beyond the scale that they know how to deal with.

This is largely because the internet is the definition of a free market. Tech consumers are actively encouraged to equal and even surpass the knowledge of distributors regarding the limits of the internet. It seems that, in 2019, every man and his dog can override firewalls and outpace content regulation bots so that sharing platforms become like the proverbial hydra – take down one streaming avenue and another appears. Our computers live in international waters and citizenry armies crop up and disperse like waves.

Butโ€ฆ isnโ€™t that kind of the point of the internet? Wasnโ€™t it originally created as a bipartisan kraken spreading its tentacles to connect all corners of the globe to facilitate inter-citizen information sharing? Isnโ€™t that distinct lack of regulation what empowers us?

Itโ€™s a tricky conundrum, and one undoubtedly being discussed in social media boardrooms around the world right this second. Can content still be king in an environment of hyper-regulation? Does a filter exist that keeps out all the bad stuff but still lets us see the good stuff?

As far as Marxist conflict theory goes, this could be the turning point. Governments around the world have called for more regulation on social regarding violent content, as itโ€™s clear that the current safeguards arenโ€™t working. The first step must certainly be to adjust the barometers of regulatory systems so that equal weight is given to all forms of radicalism. Far more attention has been paid in the past few decades to stemming radicalisation from non-white extremist groups, allowing white supremacism to flourish into an insidious and thriving online community.

Presumably more announcements like the one Facebook made this week are set to come from big social in the near future. Does this mean we may lose the freedom to operate within social media weโ€™ve come to expect? Maybe. Is that a worthy price to pay to stop aiding extremists to spread messages of hate? Absolutely.

But, make no mistake, all the Facebook safeguards in the world wonโ€™t stop the existence of white supremacy, only its reach. How do we stop the existence of white supremacy? No idea. But making an effort to talk to and understand your neighbour no matter their creed is surely a good place to start.

Accessibility