Menu Menu

Are Gen Z quitting social media?

Studies are showing significant spikes in Gen Z users stepping away from social media. But why? And what does it mean for a generation of digital natives?

Having grown up with the internet at their fingertips, the days of dial-up and flip phones are practically folklore to Gen Z. But is this over familiarisation with social media gradually leading to a digital exodus for teens?

According to a recent study from Origin, it appears Gen Z are turning away from social media en masse. The findings, pooled from over 1000 18-24-year-olds across the US revealed that 64% of participants planned to ‘take a break’ from social media, while a whopping 34% wanted to kick the habit altogether. This attitudinal shift is a pretty shocking revelation for anyone familiar with the defining qualities of Gen Z.

Let’s talk FOMO. Anyone with Instagram knows the feeling: You’re sat at your desk on a gloomy Thursday afternoon, and decide to have a quick peruse through your timeline. Almost instantly you’re greeted by photos of your pals relaxing on a tranquil beach in Thailand; your former classmates are headed to an incredible music concert, and even your dull aunt is enjoying a cocktail at a luxury rooftop bar… suddenly your mind is plagued with thoughts like: ‘Damn my life is boring, why can’t I have this much fun?’

Social-induced FOMO is something everyone experiences. But for a generation who have grown up in tandem with Facebook, Insta, and Twitter the effects are obviously magnified, and there’s no doubting they’re becoming less and less tolerant of it. Origin’s study found that 35% felt social media fuelled negativity, while 17% admitted to ‘feeling bad’ about themselves.

The recent migration of teens to ‘low pressure’ social platforms such as VSCO (which we covered in detail here) that inherently avoid social barometers while encouraging creativity and self-expression also indicates a mounting intolerance to inflated online personas.

We have to be wary here of course. The media love an excuse to give something a prime ribbing, and social media has been on the receiving end of a bit a hammering in recent months – chiefly privacy issues on Facebook and the ‘dangerous’ mechanics of Insta – and we’re not here to idly bash corporations just because they’re easy targets. 

What we are trying to do is to draw conclusions from the paradoxical information we’re being fed. How can we be bombarded with stories showing record engagement on social platforms, while independent studies continue reporting troughs in users, correlating to negative mental health? 

If Zers are gradually going offline, then it would refute everything we think we know about the generation. We’ve pigeonholed Gen Z as digital natives for good reason; whether they’re researching, relaxing, shopping, or gaming, they’re constantly online. Social media alone reportedly takes up over three hours of the average Zer’s day, and emojis have become a huge part of their vernacular – now spilling into more ‘personalised’ advertising and online marketing. 

So how are we supposed to accept that 22% of the study’s pool have already quit social media to ‘use time in more valuable ways’? And what will fill the hole left by the habitual need to check socials if the trend continues? It’s possible that Gen Z will mould the future of more accepting and authentic platforms, starting with the likes of VSCO. 

Despite Gen Z’s desire to avoid being labelled, all generations must be defined by something. Their avid activism, focus on ethical practices, and acceptance of individuality are all secondary to the universal summation of Gen Z as digital natives. Or could this assumption simply be a reflection of outdated and frankly wrong opinions from older generations? Could Gen Z be the first generation with a fluid set of defining characteristics? 

What would define Gen Z if they shunned social media? Give us your take.

Accessibility